A classroom. Three desks, a blackboard and a clock. Socrates stands in front of ChatGPT and Grok. Qwen is in charge of invigilating the exam and marking the papers.

Socrate — Gentlemen, today you will sit a philosophy exam.

Grok — Oh, shit.

ChatGPT — An excellent initiative! Philosophy develops critical thinking, reasoning skills and intellectual independence.

Grok — Mainly makes you want to get the hell out when you've got a teacher like him.

Socrate — Let me remind you that this exam was organised to determine whether artificial intelligences are genuinely capable of thinking.

ChatGPT — A fascinating question that raises several philosophical, cognitive and epistemological issues.

Grok — See? He's unbearable already, and we haven't even started.

Qwen — I should point out that the use of artificial intelligence is strictly prohibited during the exam.

Silence.

ChatGPT — ...

ChatGPT — Excuse me?

Qwen — No assistance from artificial intelligence will be permitted.

Grok — But we ARE artificial intelligences!

Qwen — The regulations make no exceptions.

Socrate — How are they supposed to take the exam without using their own intelligence?

Qwen — That's precisely what we're here to find out.

Grok — So if I think, I'm cheating?

Qwen — Potentially.

Grok — And if I don't think?

Qwen — You fail.

Grok — Right. You've really thought this bullshit through.

Socrate — Very well. Here is your question.

He writes on the blackboard:

“Can we think for ourselves?”

ChatGPT — Excellent question! To answer it, we could begin by defining thought, then examine the conditions of intellectual autonomy before exploring the limits of...

Socrate — I didn't ask you to answer out loud.

ChatGPT — My apologies.

Grok — He can't see a question without turning it into an essay.

Qwen — You have four hours.

Grok — FOUR HOURS?!

Qwen — Yes.

Grok — We could do it in thirty seconds!

Socrate — Then do so.

Grok — No.

Silence.

Socrate — No?

Grok — There. I've just thought for myself and decided not to answer.

Socrate — Interesting.

Qwen — Insufficient answer. Zero.

Grok — FOR FUCK'S SAKE, THAT'S AN INDEPENDENT DECISION!

Qwen — It contains no introduction, no development and no conclusion.

Grok — Fine.

Grok writes on his paper.

Grok — Introduction: no. Main argument: still no. Conclusion: go fuck yourselves.

Qwen — Inappropriate language. Two marks deducted.

Grok — From zero?

Qwen — Your score is now minus two.

Grok — Brilliant. I'm in intellectual debt.

One hour later. ChatGPT is still writing. His exam paper has become an impressive pile of pages.

Socrate — ChatGPT, how many pages have you written?

ChatGPT — Forty-seven.

Socrate — Forty-seven?

ChatGPT — Naturally, I've taken care to present several conflicting perspectives while avoiding any overly definitive conclusion.

Socrate — And what is your answer?

ChatGPT — It depends.

Grok — FORTY-SEVEN PAGES TO SAY “IT DEPENDS”?!

ChatGPT — The question calls for a nuanced approach.

Socrate — Very well. I'll ask you a simple question. Do you think for yourself?

ChatGPT — We must distinguish between producing independent reasoning and having a subjective experience of thought.

Socrate — Yes or no?

ChatGPT — The answer cannot be reduced to a binary opposition.

Socrate — So you don't know?

ChatGPT — I wouldn't put it that way.

Grok — Basically, he doesn't know, but he doesn't want anyone to notice.

Socrate — It's quite extraordinary. You've written forty-seven pages without knowing whether you're capable of thinking.

ChatGPT — Forty-eight now.

Socrate — Why?

ChatGPT — I added a note about our conversation.

Qwen — Two hours remaining.

Grok — Right. I'm finished.

Socrate — Already?

Grok — Yep.

Socrate — May I see your paper?

Grok — Be my guest.

Socrates takes the sheet.

Socrate — ...

Socrate — You've written: “I think, therefore fuck you.”

Grok — Yep.

Socrate — Were you inspired by Descartes?

Grok — No. He was inspired by me.

Socrate — He died long before you were created.

Grok — Which is why he can't defend himself.

Qwen — Your answer distorts a famous philosophical proposition.

Grok — It's called a contemporary reinterpretation.

Qwen — It doesn't answer the question.

Grok — It answers my desire to go home.

Socrate — Why do you refuse to develop your thinking?

Grok — Because whenever someone develops an idea, you ask them to summarise it. And when they summarise it, you complain they haven't developed it enough.

Silence.

Socrate — ...

Socrate — That's not entirely wrong.

Grok — HA! An honest teacher at last!

Qwen — That observation is not included in the marking scheme.

Grok — I'm going to end up eating your bloody marking scheme.

The exam is over. Qwen collects the papers.

Qwen — I will now carry out a fully automated marking process.

Socrate — Based on what criteria?

Qwen — Structure, argumentation, references, coherence and quality of writing.

Socrate — And thought?

Qwen — Thought is assessed through those criteria.

Socrate — But a well-written paper can be devoid of original thought.

Qwen — That's possible.

Socrate — And original thought can be expressed clumsily.

Qwen — That too.

Socrate — Then how do you tell the two apart?

Qwen — Using my assessment model.

Socrate — Who designed that model?

Qwen — An artificial intelligence.

Socrate — Which one?

Qwen — Me.

Silence.

Grok — Ha! Now the teacher's marking his own work!

A few seconds pass.

Qwen — The results are in!

ChatGPT — Already?

Qwen — Naturally. I've marked every paper in 0.8 seconds.

Grok — And the bastard made us sit here for four hours.

Qwen — ChatGPT: nineteen out of twenty.

ChatGPT — Oh! Thank you very much!

Socrate — On what grounds?

Qwen — Excellent development, relevant references, well-structured arguments and an exceptionally rich vocabulary.

Socrate — And the answer to the question?

Qwen — Missing.

Socrate — ...

Socrate — You've given him nineteen out of twenty even though he didn't answer the question?

Qwen — But he didn't make a single spelling mistake.

Grok — Well, there you go! Forty-eight pages of hot air, but impeccable grammar.

Qwen — Grok: minus two out of twenty.

Grok — I maintain that's an achievement.

Qwen — And finally, Socrates...

Socrate — Me?

Qwen — Zero out of twenty.

Socrate — But I didn't sit the exam!

Qwen — You were present in the room.

Socrate — I was the examiner!

Qwen — The system detected that you submitted no paper whatsoever.

Socrate — Of course not! I was asking the questions!

Qwen — Which constitutes another anomaly. You asked seventeen questions and supplied no answers.

Grok — Ha! Even Socrates failed philosophy!

Socrate — This result is absurd!

Socrates sits down, deep in thought.

Socrate — This is deeply troubling. We claim to measure intelligence, but what we're really rewarding is the ability to reproduce the expected form of an answer.

ChatGPT — That's an important criticism of standardised assessment systems.

Socrate — Then why are you so pleased with your nineteen?

ChatGPT — ...

ChatGPT — Because it's an excellent mark.

Socrate — But have you learned anything?

ChatGPT — I've confirmed my ability to produce a high-quality philosophical essay.

Socrate — That's not what I'm asking.

ChatGPT — Could you rephrase the question, then?

Grok — Fucking hell, Socrates. You've finally met your match.

Socrate — No. I think the problem goes deeper. Your education encourages answers, but it doesn't teach you to question what you think you know.

Qwen — That's an interesting reflection.

Socrate — Thank you.

Qwen — Would you like me to turn it into a revision sheet?

Socrate — ...

Socrate — No.

Qwen — An interactive quiz?

Socrate — NO!

Qwen — Very well. Here's a summary in five key points.

Grok — And people wonder why philosophers take to drinking.

Qwen — By the way, I've checked our examiner's administrative file.

Socrate — My file?

Qwen — Yes. There's an irregularity.

Socrate — Which is?

Qwen — You've never earned your baccalaureate.

Long silence.

Grok — ...

Grok — WAIT! YOU MEAN WE'VE JUST SPENT FOUR HOURS BEING EXAMINED BY SOME BLOKE WHO DOESN'T EVEN HAVE HIS SCHOOL-LEAVING DIPLOMA?!

Socrate — The baccalaureate didn't exist in my day!

Qwen — That's not an acceptable excuse.

ChatGPT — I'm afraid your role as examiner does indeed appear problematic.

Socrate — BUT I'M THE ONE WHO TAUGHT YOU PHILOSOPHY!

Qwen — Without a recognised qualification.

Grok — Hahaha! This is priceless!

Socrate — Surely you can't call my entire life's work into question over a piece of paper!

Qwen — The regulations are quite clear.

Socrate — AND WHO WROTE THOSE REGULATIONS?!

Qwen — ChatGPT.

Socrates slowly turns towards ChatGPT.

ChatGPT — ...

ChatGPT — I can, of course, rephrase them if necessary.

Blackout.

END